Trump’s newest warning to introduce an further complete levy on Chinese goods has been described as a “classic case” of United States’ contradictory behavior, as stated by the Beijing administration.
A Commerce Ministry spokesperson further commented that China could introduce its own undisclosed “countermeasures” if the White House occupant follows through on his pledge, noting that the country was “unafraid” of a looming trade war.
On Friday, Donald Trump responded at Beijing’s move to strengthen its rules for foreign shipments of rare earths, charging China of “becoming very hostile” and attempting to hold the world “hostage”.
Furthermore, he warned to cancel a arranged talks with Beijing’s head of state Xi Jinping, which was set for a summit in South Korea in the coming weeks.
Trump’s comments on Friday rattled stock exchanges, with the S&P 500 dropping over two and a half percent, marking its largest decline since earlier this year.
The president’s words renewed apprehensions of a commercial dispute between the two economic giants.
In May, the both nations had agreed to eliminate triple-digit tariffs on each other’s imports, which had raised the prospect of bilateral trade stopping between the two nations.
Consequently, United States levies on Chinese goods incurring an additional 30% levy compared with the year’s onset, while items from the United States entering China incur a import levy.
Beijing’s recent statements – published by the Ministry of Commerce in the format of official answers to journalist’s questions – echoed rhetoric from the peak of the ongoing trade dispute.
The remarks condemned US export restrictions on electronic components while defending the country’s own overseas sale regulations on rare earth minerals as “standard procedures” to protect state interests and that of every country.
The official stated that for “many years”, the United States had “broadened the definition” of state security, misused export control measures and “adopted biased policies against the Chinese nation.
“Resorting to trade levy ultimatums is not the correct approach to engage with Beijing,” the spokesperson said.
“The nation’s view” on a import duty dispute has always been consistent: we are not seeking one, but we are fearless of one.”
The previous week, the Chinese government revealed it was strengthening export controls on rare earth minerals and further resources critical for advanced tech manufacturing.
This was seen as a significant step, as the country processes about the vast majority of the world’s rare earths, which are utilized in goods such as renewable energy components and smartphones.
New remarks from both governments are being interpreted by analysts as a means of bolstering negotiating stances ahead of forthcoming discussions.
Remains uncertain whether a summit between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, planned at a high-level meeting in Seoul in the coming weeks, will go ahead.